Marshall McLuhan’s Warnings on Technology Resonate Amid Peter Thiel’s Ambiguous Stance on Humanity
By Nick Ripatrazone — July 28, 2025
More than four decades after his death in 1980, Canadian media theorist Marshall McLuhan’s prescient warnings about technology and its transformative impact on human identity ring truer than ever. His insights eerily anticipate the digital age and the complex debates swirling around artificial intelligence, transhumanism, and the future of humanity—debates recently reignited by billionaire entrepreneur Peter Thiel’s hesitant and enigmatic remarks on human survival in the face of technological evolution.
The Visionary Who Saw the Internet Before It Existed
Marshall McLuhan, famous for coining phrases like “the medium is the message” and “the global village,” was a towering figure in ’60s and ’70s media studies. His thoughts on how electronic media reshape human perception amassed enormous public attention, including a feature in Playboy in 1969 and over 30 articles in The New York Times alone in 1967. Prominent cultural figures such as Andy Warhol and John Lennon counted him among their intellectual influences.
Despite initial acclaim, McLuhan’s ideas eventually met skepticism and ridicule, relegating him to the margins of academia. Yet in retrospect, McLuhan’s observations—made decades before the rise of the internet, social media, and smartphones—encapsulate the disorienting experience of living online today. His description of people as “porous,” “discarnate beings” lacking a physical body when engaging with media reveals a deep understanding of the digital experience that resembles scrolling through platforms like TikTok or X (formerly Twitter).
The Thiel Interview that Sparked Concern
The relevance of McLuhan’s warnings surfaced again in June 2025 during a New York Times interview conducted by Ross Douthat with Peter Thiel, the billionaire venture capitalist and outspoken proponent of transhumanism. When asked if he preferred the human race to endure, Thiel hesitated, provoking an uneasy moment and raising questions on his personal vision of humanity’s future.
Douthat had framed the query around transhumanism—a movement advocating for the radical enhancement and transformation of humans via advanced technologies. These innovations range from genetic editing and brain-computer interfaces to cryonics and bionic augmentations. Thiel’s reluctance to affirm humanity’s continuation as it currently exists contrasts sharply with the mainstream hope that technological progress will merely enhance human life. Some fear his ambiguous position hints at a desire among the ultra-wealthy to transcend biological limitations, potentially leaving the rest of society behind.
From Julian Huxley’s Transhumanism to Posthuman Ambitions
The term “transhumanism” was introduced by English biologist Julian Huxley in the 1950s, who championed humanity’s transformation beyond its current frailties. He envisaged humanity “remaining man, but transcending himself” through scientific and technological advances. Today, this idea has stretched toward posthumanism—creating an entirely new species rather than improved versions of humans.
Peter Thiel’s significant investments exemplify these aspirations: backing ventures that enable embryo selection through genetic screening, funding anti-aging research, and supporting the Enhanced Games, where athletes use performance enhancers to achieve “superhuman” capabilities. His hesitation in publicly affirming human endurance may suggest readiness for a future where biological humans yield to machine or cybernetic successors.
McLuhan’s Myth of Narcissus and the Digital Age
McLuhan often invoked the myth of Narcissus to explain society’s relationship with technology. Contrary to common interpretation, the myth highlights humans’ dangerous infatuation with technological “extensions” of themselves, mistakenly treated as separate entities rather than parts of the self. This “idolatry of technology” breeds psychic numbness and disembodiment.
He understood that each technological medium creates a new environment influencing how humans communicate and conceive themselves, often without conscious awareness. The television era, which McLuhan experienced firsthand, preluded a deeper transformation that the internet later accelerated. Today’s digital immersion—with algorithms, data harvesting, and virtual interactions—fully embodies McLuhan’s vision of a “discarnate data” existence.
A Call for Moral Grounding and Community
Though fascinated by technological advances, McLuhan was deeply concerned about the lack of ethical grounding underlying rapid innovation. After converting to Catholicism during his doctoral studies, he emphasized that “without a body, man becomes violent,” warning against a future devoid of physical embodiment and community. He foresaw the Internet’s potential to erode personal identity and privacy—a warning decades before data exploitation became pervasive.
McLuhan advocated for preserving genuine human connection amid technological distractions, cautioning against surrendering to the illusions of virtual relationships. His call for moral reflection remains critical as society navigates the challenges posed by artificial intelligence and biotechnology.
Looking Ahead: Lessons from the Past for Our Digital Future
Peter Thiel’s recent evasiveness about human survival encapsulates a broader societal unease about the trajectory of artificial intelligence and transhumanism. While technology holds promises of extending life, augmenting abilities, and expanding consciousness, it also poses risks of alienation, identity loss, and ethical dilemmas.
Marshall McLuhan’s pioneering insights remind us that technology is never neutral—it transforms not only our tools but the very fabric of human experience. Recognizing this is essential as we confront a future where the boundaries between human and machine blur, challenging us to preserve what makes us fundamentally human.
For more in-depth analysis and commentary, subscribe to the Slatest newsletter.
